PlaceDossier / BC places / Capital
Juan de Fuca (Part 2)
An electoral area of the Capital Regional District. 399 people lived here in 2021, up 110% from 2016, on 1,285 km² of land. It takes in Port Renfrew and River Jordan.
BC place · electoral area
How Juan de Fuca (Part 2) compares with BC's other rural areas
- Emergency care: the nearest emergency department is in Duncan, 56 km away in a straight line. Further by road.
- Internet: the 9th most homes without 50/10 Mbps of BC's 159 rural electoral areas. 89% of homes have no 50/10 Mbps service recorded, compared with 19% without it in a typical rural area.
Typical for its size No scheduled buses, no licensed child care on the Province's list and 1 fire hall.
Checked, nothing found No evacuation order or alert since April 2017.
How we compare
Each figure is set against BC's places of the same kind: cities of 50,000 or more, towns of 10,000 to 50,000, towns of 2,000 to 10,000, villages and towns under 2,000, or rural electoral areas. A figure stands out when it's among the top tenth of its kind at the end that matters to a buyer and clearly off the typical one, the middle place of that kind. Where fewer than 15 places of its kind have the figure, it's set against all BC places with it. A figure only counts when its source speaks for the place: a climate or air station within 15 km and 300 m of its ground, the place's own police service, at least 1,000 people for census figures and 25 homes for internet. A point that stands out has an ochre bar on its left, its section's stamp is filled ochre, and a dot in the bar at the top of the page marks that section; "Typical for its size" is a plain outline and "Nothing on record" a dotted one. In each strip a tick is one place, the tall tick the typical one, the dot this place, and the end that matters on the right. Facts that matter at any size (an evacuation order, emergency care far away, little mobile coverage) are said whatever the size, and mark a section as standing out only when they too are in the top tenth of its kind. A section is marked typical only where a figure in it is set against the typical one and none sits far from it (outside the middle half of its kind, or clearly off the typical one), and "nothing on record" only where it shows nothing.
Hazards Typical for its size
No evacuation order or alert since April 2017, and 0.6% of its land burned by wildfire since 1996.
- Burned by wildfire since 1996
- 0.6% typical rural area: 2%
- Years with a mapped wildfire since 1917
- 47, the latest 2025
- Evacuation events since April 2017
- none on the Province's record
- Radon: homes tested at or above the guideline in its health region
- 1.8% in South Vancouver Island (BC: 7.9%)
More on hazards
Its land, ranked in BC
| Here | Rank in BC | |
|---|---|---|
| In the farmland reserve (ALR) | 1.8% | 208th of 267 (tied) |
| Burned by wildfire since 1996 | 0.6% | 134th of 215 (tied) |
| Years with a mapped wildfire since 1917 | 47 | most recent 2025 |
| Under mineral, placer or coal titles | 19% | 51st of 219 (tied) |
| Land area | 1,285 km² |
Shares of the land area, worked out from the Province's maps. Fire perimeters before the 1950s are less complete. A title or a past fire somewhere in the area says nothing about a given lot: a property report checks the parcel itself.
Large fires (1,000 ha or more) since 1990
No wildfire of 1,000 ha or more has burned in Juan de Fuca (Part 2) since 1990, in the BC Wildfire Service's perimeters.
Smaller mapped fires since 2016
Since 2016, the BC Wildfire Service mapped 18 smaller fires (under 1,000 ha) that reached Juan de Fuca (Part 2), newest first. This season's are as mapped by November 9, 2026.
- 2026Mount Jack wildfire337 ha in all · 74% of it here250 ha here
- 2025Unnamed fire V608075.4 ha in all5.4 ha here
- 2025Unnamed fire V609300.4 ha in all0.4 ha here
- 2023Unnamed fire V624001.9 ha in all1.9 ha here
- 2022Unnamed fire V625581.7 ha in all1.7 ha here
- 2020Unnamed fire V611685.4 ha in all5.4 ha here
- 2020Sooke Lake wildfire2.2 ha in all2.2 ha here
- 2020Begg Creek wildfire1.7 ha in all1.7 ha here
And 10 more
- 2020Trap Mountain wildfire1.1 ha in all1.1 ha here
- 2019Rough Creek wildfire3.4 ha in all3.4 ha here
- 2018Unnamed fire V6099883 ha in all83 ha here
- 2017Unnamed fire V6229155 ha in all55 ha here
- 2017Unnamed fire V6228344 ha in all44 ha here
- 2017Unnamed fire V6230940 ha in all40 ha here
- 2017Unnamed fire V6228439 ha in all39 ha here
- 2017Unnamed fire V6229719 ha in all · 88% of it here17 ha here
- 2016Unnamed fire V600161.2 ha in all1.2 ha here
- 2016Unnamed fire V602140.9 ha in all0.9 ha here
Small fires that were never mapped as a perimeter aren't listed: the BC Wildfire Service maps an outline for only some of the fires it records. Past fire is history, not a forecast. The chance of fire on a lot today depends on what the record doesn't show: the forest and grass around it, the slope, what has been thinned or burned since, and how far it is from a fire hall. Every BC season and large fire since 1990.
Sources: BC Wildfire Fire Perimeters – Historical, BC Wildfire Service; BC Wildfire Fire Perimeters – Current, BC Wildfire Service; BC Wildfire Fire Incident Locations – Historical, BC Wildfire Service; BC Wildfire Fire Locations – Current, BC Wildfire Service (Open Government Licence – British Columbia), as published on November 10, 2026; 2021 census subdivision boundaries, Statistics Canada (Statistics Canada Open Licence). Outlines simplified and places measured by PlaceDossier.
How the land burned
On the Province's ecosystem map, Juan de Fuca (Part 2)'s land is 50% NDT2 (burned in large fires about every 200 years) and 50% NDT1 (rarely burned, about every 250 to 350 years and in patches). Its main biogeoclimatic zone is Coastal Western Hemlock (97%). This is how the land burned before fires were put out, not its fire risk today. A report names the type over a lot. Every place's natural fire regime.
Source: BEC Map (biogeoclimatic zones and natural disturbance types), Province of BC (Open Government Licence – British Columbia), read 2026-10-12; areas worked out on the census boundaries.
Evacuations since April 2017
None of the wildfire evacuation orders or alerts in the Province's record since April 2017 covered 5% or more of the land or homes in Juan de Fuca (Part 2).
Listed when an order or alert area covered at least 5% of the land in Juan de Fuca (Part 2), or lay mostly in Juan de Fuca (Part 2) and held at least 5% as many homes as the 2021 census counted there. An order means people were told to leave; an alert, to be ready to leave. Homes are the record's own counts, area by area, shown where the areas lie mostly in Juan de Fuca (Part 2). The Province's record starts in April 2017: earlier evacuations aren't in it. A lot's report checks every order and alert over the lot itself, and any in effect now.
Sources: Historical Orders and Alerts, Emergency Management and Climate Readiness (Open Government Licence – British Columbia), as published on November 2, 2026; 2021 census subdivision boundaries and dwelling counts, Statistics Canada (Statistics Canada Open Licence). Each order and alert area placed in the municipalities and electoral areas it covers by us.
Evacuations for floods, landslides and other hazards since April 2017
None of the flood, landslide or other non-fire evacuation orders or alerts in the Province's record since April 2017 covered 5% or more of the land or homes in Juan de Fuca (Part 2).
Sources: Historical Orders and Alerts, Emergency Management and Climate Readiness (Open Government Licence – British Columbia), as published on November 2, 2026; 2021 census subdivision boundaries and dwelling counts, Statistics Canada (Statistics Canada Open Licence). Each order and alert area placed in the municipalities and electoral areas it covers by us.
78 landslides are recorded inside Juan de Fuca (Part 2) in the Preliminary Canadian Landslide Database (version 14.0), including 34 debris avalanches, 25 debris flows and 7 debris slides. The database lists slides known to have happened, mapped from inventories, satellite images and lidar. It isn't a hazard map, and some parts of BC are mapped in far more detail than others. Landslides near a given lot.
The Province lists 16 dams in Juan de Fuca (Part 2), 7 of them classed High or above for the harm a failure would do downstream: Sooke Lake Dam (Extreme), Jordan Diversion Dam (Very High) and Elliott Dam (Very High) among them. The class rates what a failure would do, not how likely one is; a report names the dams within 1 km of a lot. Dams in BC, by place.
3 Water Survey of Canada gauges in Juan de Fuca (Part 2) have 5 or more years of yearly peak flows: San Juan River near Port Renfrew peaked highest at 1,360 m³/s in 2020 (57 years on record), Garbage Creek near the Mouth peaked highest at 17.6 m³/s in 2006 (24 years on record) and Renfrew Creek near Port Renfrew peaked highest at 123 m³/s in 2024 (22 years on record). 2 set their record in the last 10 years. A gauge's record is the river where it stands, not a flood line; a report gives the nearest gauge on a river by the lot. River gauges in BC, by place.
Radon
In the South Vancouver Island health region, 1 of the 55 homes tested (1.8%) in Health Canada's 2009–2011 survey was at or above the 200 Bq/m³ guideline; across BC, 143 of 1,817 (7.9%).
The survey tested about a hundred volunteer homes per health region, with one long-term test each. That gives a rough regional picture: it isn't a map, and a region where few or none tested high can still have homes above the guideline. The only way to know is to test the home: radon and buying a home in BC.
Source: Cross-Canada Survey of Radon Concentrations in Homes (2009–2011), Health Canada (Open Government Licence – Canada); Health Service Delivery Area Boundaries, Province of BC (Open Government Licence – British Columbia).
Check one lot: has it burned? · is it on a floodplain map? · is it behind a dike? · is there a dam nearby? · landslides nearby? · contaminated sites nearby? · radon? · how much is too steep?
Source: Agricultural Land Reserve polygons, Agricultural Land Commission (Open Government Licence – British Columbia); Fire perimeters – historical, BC Wildfire Service (Open Government Licence – British Columbia); Mineral, placer and coal tenures, Mineral Titles Branch (Open Government Licence – British Columbia); Preliminary Canadian Landslide Database, version 14.0 (May 2026), Brideau et al. (CC BY 4.0); 2021 census subdivision boundaries, Statistics Canada (Statistics Canada Open Licence).
Cost to own
Rural property tax rates are set for each electoral area and its service areas; the figures and a calculator are under More.
- Typical home value against typical household income
- 11.1 years of income (fewer than 1,000 people, so a rough figure)
- Median home value (owners' estimate, 2021)
- $750,000
- Median monthly rent (2021)
- –
- Speculation and vacancy tax
- doesn't apply here
More on cost to own
Property tax
In Juan de Fuca (Part 2), the Province collects the property tax. At 2026 rates every home here pays at least $2.95 to $3.10 per $1,000 of assessed value: about $2,946 to $3,096 a year on a $1,000,000 home, before the home owner grant. Local service areas (fire protection, recreation, street lighting, water and others) cover parts of the area and add to that, up to $0.90 per $1,000 each; which ones cover a given lot is on its tax notice.
- Regional district (the electoral area's share) $0.82
- Regional hospital district $0.12
- School (set by the Province) $1.13
- Provincial rural tax $0.39
- Police tax $0.09
- Other $0.40
On $500,000: at least about $1,473 to $1,548 a year; on $1,000,000: at least about $2,946 to $3,096, at 2026 rates, before the home owner grant.
Your bill uses BC Assessment's value for the property, which can differ from its price, and may also include parcel taxes and utility fees (water, sewer, garbage) that aren't rates on value. The home owner grant takes up to $570 off the bill of a home its owner lives in ($770 in the Province's northern and rural area in 2026, and up to $845, or $1,045 there, for seniors, veterans and people with a disability), for homes assessed at $2,075,000 or less in 2026; above that it shrinks by $5 for each $1,000. From 2027 the northern and rural extra ends and the regular grant is $570 everywhere. The owner applies each year, and must pay at least $350 in tax ($100 for the higher grant) after it. Our summary of the Province's page, read 2026-10-04. Rural rates aren't ranked: what a home pays depends on the service areas it's in. Confirm with the Province's Surveyor of Taxes. How property tax works in BC.
Source: The Surveyor of Taxes' rural tax rates, 2026, Province of BC (the rates only: facts set in public bylaws, not open data); Home owner grant, Province of BC (summarised in our words, read 2026-10-04).
Juan de Fuca (Part 2) is outside the Province's speculation and vacancy tax area, so the tax doesn't apply to a home here. Our summary of the Province's pages, read 2026-10-04. Where the tax applies, and who pays.
The typical home here is the median value owners gave the 2021 census, and the typical household's income is the median for 2020: a home that costs 11.1 years of income took that many years of a typical household's whole income. "Typical" for places its size is the middle of BC's rural electoral areas.
Land for sale nearby
The 5 nearest listings on AcreScout within 25 km of Port Renfrew, nearest first; listings with only an approximate location come last.
| Listing | Asking price | Size | Per acre | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16920 Beachview Dr Pt RenfrewPort Renfrew, listed 152 days ago | $359,900 | 0.31 acres | – | 100 m |
| 16911 Beachview DrPort Renfrew, listed 205 days ago | $329,900 | 0.27 acres | – | 100 m |
| 16922 Beachview Dr Pt RenfrewPort Renfrew, listed 171 days ago | $330,000 | 0.32 acres | – | 200 m |
| 16997 Beachview DrPort Renfrew, listed 147 days ago | $589,900 | 0.91 acres | – | near Port Renfrew (location approximate) |
| 16926 Beachview ClosePort Renfrew, listed 132 days ago | $268,500 | Not given | – | near Port Renfrew (location approximate) |
Distances are straight lines to the listing's pin. Where AcreScout places a listing only roughly, no distance is given, only the place it's near. Per acre is left out under about an acre. Asking prices are what sellers ask, not what land sells for.
Listings: AcreScout, a Buretto site; active listings as of 2026-11-15. Asking prices set by the sellers; not a valuation.
Source: Census of Population 2021, Statistics Canada (Statistics Canada Open Licence).
What you can build Typical for its size
On a lot zoned for a house, the zoning must allow at least a secondary suite or a garden suite (the provincial minimum).
- Homes allowed on a house lot (provincial minimum)
- a house and a secondary suite or garden suite
- Short-term rentals
- The Province's principal residence requirement doesn't apply in Juan de Fuca (Part 2) (list in force from June 1, 2026).
- In the farmland reserve (ALR)
- 1.8% typical rural area: 4%
More on what you can build
In Juan de Fuca (Part 2), a zone limited to detached houses must allow at least one secondary suite or detached accessory home (a garden suite or carriage house) next to a house. A floor of 3 or 4 homes applies on rural land only inside an urban containment boundary drawn in a regional growth strategy, and most rural land is outside one. None of it applies on land in an Islands Trust local trust area or under a rural land use bylaw, and in the Agricultural Land Reserve the Commission's limits come first. How many homes you can build on a lot.
The Province's principal residence requirement doesn't apply in Juan de Fuca (Part 2) (list in force from June 1, 2026), so the provincial rule doesn't limit short-term rentals to the host's home. Local bylaws, including the zone's own rules, can be stricter. Hosts anywhere in BC register each unit with the provincial registry. Short-term rental rules in BC.
Reports for lots in Juan de Fuca (Part 2) can't name the zone: we have no open zoning map for it (see the places covered).
Ask the Capital Regional District for a lot's zone and what it allows.
The federal boundaries put 3 reserves of Pacheedaht First Nation in or beside Juan de Fuca (Part 2). On reserve land the First Nation decides land use, not the local zoning bylaw; a report says when a lot is on reserve land or within 500 m of it. Reserve land in BC, by place.
The Capital Regional District's building inspection covers all of Juan de Fuca (Part 2) (Building Regulation Bylaw No. 3741): building, adding on, moving or demolishing a building needs a building permit, and the work is inspected. Our reading of the Capital Regional District's own page, checked 2026-10-07. Do you need a building permit on rural land?
The Province maps 5 designated community watersheds, Leech Community Watershed, Sooke Lake Community Watershed and Council Community Watershed among them, over 11% of Juan de Fuca (Part 2): land draining to a licensed drinking-water intake, where logging and roads on Crown land must protect the supply. A report says whether a lot lies in one and whose water it is. Community watersheds in BC, by place.
Check one lot: is it in the ALR? · is the soil good for farming? · is it in a community watershed?
Source: Agricultural Land Reserve polygons, Agricultural Land Commission (Open Government Licence – British Columbia); 2021 census subdivision boundaries, Statistics Canada (Statistics Canada Open Licence).
Living here Stands out
Emergency care: the nearest emergency department is in Duncan, 56 km away in a straight line. Further by road.
- Internet: the 9th most homes without 50/10 Mbps of BC's 159 rural electoral areas. 89% of homes have no 50/10 Mbps service recorded, compared with 19% without it in a typical rural area.
- Homes with 50/10 Mbps internet or faster
- 11% typical rural area: 81%
- Homes with LTE mobile coverage
- 100%
- Nearest emergency department open around the clock
- Duncan, 56 km in a straight line
- Fire halls
- 1 on the Province's list; the nearest 100 m from Port Renfrew
- Buses
- no scheduled buses
- Licensed child care
- none on the Province's list
- Crime, weighted for how serious it is
- no police service of its own in Statistics Canada's figures: those of the Lake Cowichan RCMP detachment (rural) are under More
More on living here
Internet
11% of homes in Juan de Fuca (Part 2) have 50/10 Mbps or faster recorded, wired or fixed wireless, against 97.6% across BC. 45% have nothing at 25/5 Mbps or faster.
| Share of homes here | BC | |
|---|---|---|
| 50/10 Mbps or faster, wired or fixed wireless | 11% | 97.6% |
| 50/10 Mbps or faster over a wired line | 0.2% | 96.2% |
| 50/10 Mbps or faster over fixed wireless | 11% | 87% |
| Nothing at 25/5 Mbps or faster | 45% | 1.4% |
| LTE mobile coverage | 100% | 99.1% |
| Homes counted (2021) | 479 | 2,170,255 |
| Rank in BC, homes without 50/10 Mbps | 8th of 248 | |
This is the service providers report to the federal government (ISED), counted over each area's homes in the 2021 census. It isn't a promise for any address: ask providers whether they serve it and what it costs to connect. Satellite service, which needs only a clear view of the sky, isn't counted. Data released May 2026. What internet can a given lot get?
Source: National Broadband Data (May 2026) and Pseudo-Household Demographic Distribution (2021), Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada (Open Government Licence – Canada); 2021 census subdivision boundaries, Statistics Canada (Statistics Canada Open Licence).
Nearest hospital
The nearest hospital on the Province's list (updated 2026-10-01) is Cowichan District Hospital, Duncan, about 56 km in a straight line from Port Renfrew. Its emergency department's hours on HealthLink BC's list: 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Roads are longer than these straight lines, and a small town's emergency department can close for a shift when it's short of staff: the health authority posts these as service changes. In an emergency, call 9-1-1. How far is the nearest hospital from a property?
Source: Hospitals in BC, HealthLinkBC (Open Government Licence – British Columbia); Emergency Rooms in BC, HealthLinkBC (Open Government Licence – British Columbia).
Fire protection
In Juan de Fuca (Part 2), a fire department answers calls only inside the fire protection area its service bylaw sets, so a hall nearby doesn't by itself mean a lot is covered: ask the Capital Regional District which department responds, if any. The Province's list (updated 2026-09-11) has one fire hall in Juan de Fuca (Part 2): Port Renfrew Volunteer Fire Department. It is about 100 m in a straight line from Port Renfrew. Home insurers ask the road distance to the hall that responds, which can be far longer than the straight line. How far is the nearest fire hall, and what insurers ask
Source: First Responders (fire halls and ambulance stations), GeoBC (Open Government Licence – British Columbia).
Crime
The Lake Cowichan RCMP detachment (rural) reported a crime severity index of 54 in 2025, below BC's 92; down 26% since 2015 (BC unchanged).
| Crime severity index, 2025 | 54 (BC 92) |
|---|---|
| Violent / non-violent index | 74 / 47 (BC 98 / 91) |
| Crime severity index, 2015 | 73 (BC 93) |
| Change since 2015 | Down 26% (BC unchanged) |
| Break and enter, per 100,000 people, 2025 | 96 (BC 281) |
| Theft of a vehicle, per 100,000 people, 2025 | 68 (BC 138) |
| Theft from a vehicle, per 100,000 people, 2025 | 68 (BC 441) |
| Violent crime, per 100,000 people, 2025 | 1,719 (BC 1,531) |
| All Criminal Code offences (not traffic), per 100,000 people, 2025 | 5,101 (BC 6,943) |
Inferred: the nearest RCMP rural detachment Statistics Canada publishes figures for, about 30 km away. BC's police boundaries aren't open data, so the detachment that actually polices this place may be another.
The crime severity index weighs each offence by how serious it is (one assault counts for more than several thefts), with Canada in 2006 set at 100. Rates are per 100,000 people living in the police service's area, so places with many visitors, commuters or seasonal homes read high, and in small places a few incidents swing the figures a lot. These are crimes reported to police, not all crime.
Source: Statistics Canada, Table 35-10-0063-01, Crime severity index and weighted clearance rates, police services in British Columbia (Statistics Canada Open Licence); Statistics Canada, Table 35-10-0184-01, Incident-based crime statistics, by detailed violations, police services in British Columbia (Statistics Canada Open Licence).
Water
190 water-supply wells on record; half are deeper than 48 m, and the median tested yield is 23 L/min.
- Water-supply wells on record
- 190; half deeper than 48 m; median tested yield 23 L/min
- Rank in BC for well depth
- 100th of 245 (tied)
More on water
Mapped aquifers
7 mapped aquifers lie in Juan de Fuca (Part 2), most wells first.
- 1Aquifer 606: Sooke-Metchosinfractured crystalline bedrock1,550 wells · low productivity
- 2Aquifer 944: Jordan River to Uglow Creek, Vancouverconfined sand and gravel (glacial)73 wells · moderate productivity
- 3Aquifer 449: West of Sooke at Orveas Bayfractured sedimentary rock64 wells · moderate productivity
- 4Aquifer 943: Jordan River to Rosemond Creek, Vancouverfractured crystalline bedrock41 wells · low productivity
- 5Aquifer 618: Port Renfrew, south side of San Juan Riverfractured crystalline bedrock26 wells · low productivity
- 6Aquifer 685: Pacheedahtunconfined sand and gravel (medium stream system)6 wells · high productivity
- 7Aquifer 1286: East of Sooke Lakefractured crystalline bedrock1 well · productivity not rated
An aquifer is listed for each place that holds at least a twentieth of it, so a sliver of one at the edge can be left out. Wells and productivity are for the whole aquifer, which can reach well beyond Juan de Fuca (Part 2). The province maps aquifers mostly in settled valleys, so a lot outside every outline can still have groundwater. Every mapped aquifer in BC · sampled lakes.
Sampled lakes
7 sampled lakes lie in Juan de Fuca (Part 2) (one only partly), largest first.
- 1Sooke Lake6 km²too few readings to judge
- 2Butchart Lake68.7 hatoo few readings to judge
- 3Old Wolf Lake24.5 ha · 55% of it heretoo few readings to judge
- 4Maid Lake13.6 hatoo few readings to judge
- 5Council Lake13.3 hatoo few readings to judge
- 6Unnamed lake in the San Juan River watershed9.5 hatoo few readings to judge
- 7Lizard Lake8.7 haclarity 8.7 m (2017–2025)
A lake is listed for each place that holds at least a twentieth of it or 100 ha of it. Clarity is the median summer Secchi depth; the nutrient class is our reading of Carlson's index from phosphorus or chlorophyll, not a provincial rating. Either is given only for a lake with at least 10 summer readings from open water, spread over at least 3 different years, since 2012. Most lakes have never been sampled, so a lake missing here may simply have no record. Every sampled lake in BC.
Source: Groundwater wells (GWELLS), Province of BC (Open Government Licence – British Columbia); Ground Water Aquifers, Water Protection and Sustainability Branch, Province of BC (Open Government Licence – British Columbia); BC Environmental Monitoring Data System (EnMoDS) results, Province of BC (Open Government Licence – British Columbia); 2021 census subdivision boundaries, Statistics Canada (Statistics Canada Open Licence).
Climate and sun
January averages 4.1 °C and July 15.3 °C, with 50 cm of snow a year, at the Port Renfrew station, 7 km from Port Renfrew (1981-2010 normals).
- January mean temperature
- 4.1 °C* typical rural area: −1.2 °C
- July mean temperature
- 15.3 °C*
- Yearly precipitation
- 3,505 mm*
- Yearly snowfall
- 50 cm* typical rural area: 88 cm
- Days a year over 30 °C
- under half a day* typical rural area: 7
- Frost-free period
- 205 days a year*
Winter sun
About 5 h 50 min of possible direct sun on December 21 at Port Renfrew, against 8 h 10 min on open ground; a lot on a slope or bench can differ by hours: open any lot's report for its own.
On March 21, 11 h 10 min against 12 h; on June 21, 14 h 50 min against 16 h. Our estimate from the terrain around the point, ground at about 15 m, seen from head height: trees, buildings and cloud aren't counted. On BC's least winter sun ranking (December sun as a share of open ground) it is 84th of 310 (tied). How winter sun is read.
More on climate and sun
| 1981-2010 normals | Rank in BC | |
|---|---|---|
| January mean temperature | 4.1 °C* | Not ranked* |
| July mean temperature | 15.3 °C* | Not ranked* |
| Yearly precipitation | 3,505 mm* | |
| Yearly snowfall | 50 cm* | Not ranked* |
| Frost-free period | 205 days a year* | |
| Average last spring and first fall frost | April 8 and October 31* | |
| Days with snow on the ground (1 cm or more) | 11 days a year; 4 days in January* | |
| Days a year over 30 °C | under half a day; no days over 35 °C* | Not ranked* |
| Wettest day in the station's record to 2010 | 292.8 mm of rain and melted snow, February 23, 1986 | |
| Most snow in a day in the station's record to 2010 | 41 cm, December 28, 1996 | |
| Deepest snow on the ground in the station's record to 2010 | 47 cm, December 29, 1996 | |
| Heating degree days, below 18 °C | 3,189 a year* | |
| Growing degree days, above 5 °C | 1,762 a year; 628 above 10 °C* |
Normals for 1981-2010 at the Port Renfrew station, about 7 km from Port Renfrew (of the communities here with a station within 30 km, the one with the most addresses); ECCC has no fuller 1991-2020 set for it. * Based on at least 20 or 15 of the 30 years, short of the World Meteorological Organization's standard: treat as a rougher guide. The records are single days measured at the station: the most rain, snow and wind it saw in its record up to 2010 (ECCC's 1981-2010 sets give records over the station's whole history, so some dates are older than 1981). Each is one event, not what to expect in a year, and the lot can get more or less than the station. Elevation matters a lot in BC: a hillside lot can be much colder and snowier than the station.
Plant hardiness zone: most homes here are in zone 8a (75%); 14% are in 8b, 10% are in 7b, on Natural Resources Canada's 2025 map. Higher numbers are milder winters. What the zones mean.
Solar panels: a south-facing panel tilted at the latitude would make about 930 kWh a year for each kW of panels at Port Renfrew, about 30 of it in December (estimated from Natural Resources Canada's 1998-2022 sunshine map). An open sky is assumed: the hills, trees and buildings around a lot cut it, and a report sets the lot's own skyline beside it. What solar panels would make in BC.
By the 2050s (2041-2070) at Port Renfrew, climate models project about 1 more day over 30 °C a year, a longest frost-free run about 55 days longer and about 8 percentage points less of winter's precipitation falling as snow, each against the same models' 1971-2000 (model projections under SSP2-4.5, a middle path for emissions). The models work on a grid of about 9 by 6 km, which averages valley floors with the slopes around them, so their own figures can sit well off a station's normals and aren't comparable with them. Their own figures there: about 1 day over 30 °C a year in 2041-2070 (range 1 to 2 across the models), against under 1 day in 1971-2000; a longest frost-free run of about 255 days (range 230 to 320), against about 200; and about 4% of winter's precipitation falling as snow (range 2% to 6%), against about 12%. The ranges run from the 10th to the 90th percentile of the models' 2041-2070 figures. The 2050s across BC.
Light at night within 1 km of Port Renfrew: faint, as around Wells or Lytton (our reading), and darker than about 90% of BC's homes (2024 satellite record). A lot away from the centre can be much darker. How dark are BC's nights?
Lightning: around Port Renfrew, a cloud-to-ground flash within 10 km on about 2 days a year and 0.02 flashes per km² a year, less than at half of BC homes (the Canadian Lightning Detection Network, 1998-2025 average, on a grid of about 11 by 7 km).
Source: Canadian Climate Normals 1991-2020 and 1981-2010, Environment and Climate Change Canada (Open Government Licence – Canada); Plant hardiness zones of Canada (2025 map), Natural Resources Canada (Open Government Licence – Canada); Medium Resolution Digital Elevation Model (MRDEM-30), Natural Resources Canada (Open Government Licence – Canada); Solar position: General Solar Position Calculations (NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory; Spencer, 1971) (Public domain); Daily average solar irradiance on tilted surfaces for all of Canada (1998-2022), Natural Resources Canada (Open Government Licence – Canada); Photovoltaic Potential and Solar Resource Maps of Canada (performance ratio), Natural Resources Canada (Open Government Licence – Canada); Statistically downscaled climate indices from CMIP6 global climate models (CanDCS-M6), Environment and Climate Change Canada and the Pacific Climate Impacts Consortium, via the Canadian Centre for Climate Services (Open Government Licence – Canada); VIIRS Nighttime Lights, 2024 annual composite, Earth Observation Group, Payne Institute for Public Policy, Colorado School of Mines (Elvidge et al. 2021, Remote Sensing 13(5):922), via Hengl, OpenGeoHub, Zenodo doi 10.5281/zenodo.7750174 (CC BY 4.0); Canadian Lightning Detection Network cloud-to-ground flashes (CanCPLDv1), Environment and Climate Change Canada (Open Government Licence – Canada).
Land use around
1 major project in assessment or approved in or near Juan de Fuca (Part 2) on the Environmental Assessment Office's register; 19% of its land is under mineral, placer or coal titles.
- Major projects in assessment or approved, in or within 5 km
- 1: Jordan Solar and Energy Storage
- Under mineral, placer or coal titles
- 19%
- Who holds them
- Largest company holders: Geomap Exploration Inc. (22% of the land under title), San Juan Quarries Ltd. (4.7%), New Sunro Copper Ltd. (1.7%); private individuals hold titles over 71% of it, on the Province's record as of October 29, 2026.
More on land use around
Major projects in Juan de Fuca (Part 2)
The Environmental Assessment Office's register places 1 major project in assessment or approved in Juan de Fuca (Part 2) or within 5 km of it: Jordan Solar and Energy Storage (power plant, in assessment (early engagement)).
| Project | Decision | Phase | Where |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jordan Solar and Energy StoragePower Plants | In Progress | Early Engagement | In Juan de Fuca (Part 2) |
Not assessed or closed: 1 project found to need no assessment, withdrawn, terminated, refused, expired or not reviewable
- Raising of Sooke Reservoir Dam by One Metre (dam, reviewed May 21, 2003: no assessment needed, operating; in Juan de Fuca (Part 2))
Major projects are those large enough to need a provincial environmental assessment: mines, power plants, pipelines, transmission lines, highways, ports and resorts. The register places each at one point; a mine, pipeline or line can reach well past it, so check the project's own page for its maps. A property report lists those within 10 km of a lot; every project in BC by place.
Source: Environmental Assessment Office project points (EPIC), Province of BC, as of 2026-11-02 (Open Government Licence – British Columbia); 2021 census subdivision boundaries, Statistics Canada (Statistics Canada Open Licence).
The Province lists one active waste discharge authorization in Juan de Fuca (Part 2) (sewage treatment or discharge site). It may discharge effluent to water or land. A report lists any within 2 km of a lot, and flags one whose point is on it. Permitted discharges in BC, by place.
The Province maps one open gravel pit or quarry in Juan de Fuca (Part 2): Renfrew Creek PRN Prospect Pit; and one open placer mine. A report lists the permits within 2 km of a lot, names an open pit or quarry within 500 m and flags one whose permit area takes in the lot. Gravel pits and mine permits in BC, by place.
On ParcelMap BC, the land in Juan de Fuca (Part 2) is 33% private, 14% Crown land with a parcel drawn (12% with no title), 1% federal, 11% the local government's; no parcel is mapped over 41%, likely most of it untitled Crown land, with lakes and road allowances. A report says who owns the land along a lot's line. Crown land next to a property, and every place's land by owner.
The Province maps 9 registered traplines over 48% of the area and 2 guide outfitter territories over nearly all in Juan de Fuca (Part 2). The maps are drawn over titled land too, but traplines are registered on Crown land: on titled land, anyone but the owner or occupier needs their written permission to trap. A report says whether either takes in a lot. Traplines and guiding territories in BC, by place.
Juan de Fuca (Part 2) lies in wildlife management units 1-3 (76%), 1-2 (22%): the Hunting and Trapping Regulations Synopsis sets seasons and closed areas by unit. Hunting and shooting on your own property.
BC Parks maps 3 parks and protected areas (Juan De Fuca Park, a provincial park; San Juan Ridge Ecological Reserve; and San Juan River Estuary Ecological Reserve) reaching into Juan de Fuca (Part 2), over 1% of its land. Recreation Sites and Trails BC lists 6 sites there. A report names the nearest park and recreation site within 25 km of a lot. Parks and recreation sites in BC, by place.
Check one lot: is there a mineral claim? · power lines nearby? · pipelines nearby? · a gravel pit nearby? · a landfill or plant nearby? · logging planned nearby? · cattle on open range? · is there a trapline? · can I hunt on it? · a park nearby? · Crown land next door?
Source: Mineral, placer and coal tenures, Mineral Titles Branch (Open Government Licence – British Columbia); 2021 census subdivision boundaries, Statistics Canada (Statistics Canada Open Licence).
People
399 people in 2021, up 110% from 2016; the median age is 44.
| Here | BC | |
|---|---|---|
| Population, 2021 | 399 | 5,000,879 |
| Change since 2016 | +110% | +7.6% |
| Median age | 44 | 42.8 |
| Under 15 | 13.8% | 14.3% |
| 65 and over | 20.0% | 20.3% |
| Median household income (2020) | $67,500 | $85,000 |
| Homes owned by the people living in them | 73.9% | 66.8% |
| Single-detached houses | 75.6% | 42.4% |
| Movable dwellings (mobile homes and the like) | 17.1% | 2.5% |
| Built before 1961 | 17.4% | 12.5% |
| Needing major repairs | 0.0% | 5.8% |
| Median home value (owners' estimate) | $750,000 | $785,000 |
| Median monthly rent | – | $1,370 |
| Worked from home | 26.9% | 22.6% |
| Unemployment rate | 7.4% | 8.4% |
Bars: the dark bar is this place, the red mark is BC.
Who lives here
| Here | BC | |
|---|---|---|
| Indigenous identity | 4.7% | 5.9% |
| Immigrants | 7.1% | 29.0% |
| Visible minority | 7.0% | 34.4% |
| No religion or a secular outlook | 65.1% | 52.1% |
Census figures, shown for context like the others. We don't rank or score places on these.
More on people
Fewer than 1,000 people live here, so Statistics Canada rounds these counts and leaves out some figures (shown as –).
Census figures are from 2021; the next census results start in 2027. Area boundaries are Statistics Canada's census subdivisions, which follow municipal and electoral area lines. The places named at the top are the official place names in the area (BC Geographical Names) with the most 2021 homes nearer them than any other name, on ISED's home points: our reading.
Source: Census of Population 2021, Statistics Canada (Statistics Canada Open Licence); BC Geographical Names, Province of BC (Open Government Licence – British Columbia); Pseudo-Household Demographic Distribution (2021), Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada (Open Government Licence – Canada).