PlaceDossier / BC places / Lakes

BC lake · 21.2 ha · Harrison River watershed

Lake Errock

Its median summer Secchi depth over 2023–2025 was 3.1 m, from 34 readings. Murkier than 72% of the 62 BC lakes with enough recent readings.

The readings

139 summer readings from open water on record from 2023 to 2025, at 1 sampling site.

Median since 2012Compared with BC lakes
Secchi depth3.1 m
2023–2025, 34 readings
Murkier than 72% of the 62 BC lakes with enough recent readings.
Total phosphorus11 µg/L
2023–2025, 71 readings
Higher than 55% of the 100 BC lakes with enough recent readings.
Chlorophyll a4.1 µg/L
2023–2025, 34 readings
Higher than 74% of the 83 BC lakes with enough recent readings.
Secchi depth how deep a black-and-white disc stays visible: deeper means clearer water
0246 202320242025 2023: median 3.1 m from 11 readings2024: median 3.5 m from 12 readings2025: median 3.0 m from 11 readingsm
Total phosphorus the nutrient that most often feeds algae in BC lakes
10 202320242025 2023: median 9.4 µg/L from 22 readings2024: median 11 µg/L from 28 readings2025: median 13 µg/L from 21 readingsµg/L
Chlorophyll a the green pigment in algae: a direct measure of how much is growing
13 202320242025 2023: median 4.2 µg/L from 11 readings2024: median 3.7 µg/L from 12 readings2025: median 3.7 µg/L from 11 readingsµg/L

Median each year (bigger dot, more readings)Middle half of BC lakesBC median

Source: BC Environmental Monitoring Data System (EnMoDS) results, Environmental Monitoring and Analysis Branch, Province of BC, records to September 19, 2026 (Open Government Licence – British Columbia); lake outlines and names: Freshwater Atlas lakes, Province of BC (Open Government Licence – British Columbia). Summaries by PlaceDossier.

Nutrient level Inferred

The measures disagree: clarity reads mesotrophic, phosphorus reads oligotrophic, algae reads mesotrophic. That's common: clarity also depends on silt and colour, not just algae.

IndexClass
From secchi depth (3.1 m, 2023–2025)44mesotrophic
From total phosphorus (11 µg/L, 2023–2025)38oligotrophic
From chlorophyll a (4.1 µg/L, 2023–2025)44mesotrophic

Inferred by us, not a provincial classification. The index was built for summer readings from the middle of a lake; ours mix sites and months, so treat the class as a rough guide.

How we worked this out

Carlson's trophic state index (Carlson 1977, Limnology and Oceanography 22:361) turns each median into a score: 60 − 14.41 ln(Secchi m), 14.42 ln(phosphorus µg/L) + 4.15, 9.81 ln(chlorophyll µg/L) + 30.6. Classes after Carlson and Simpson (1996): under 40 oligotrophic, 40 to 50 mesotrophic, 50 to 70 eutrophic, 70 and over hypereutrophic.

Year by year

YearSecchi depthTotal phosphorusChlorophyll a
20253.0 m (11)13 µg/L (21)3.7 µg/L (11)
20243.5 m (12)11 µg/L (28)3.7 µg/L (12)
20233.1 m (11)9.4 µg/L (22)4.2 µg/L (11)

Median of each year's May to October readings; the number of readings is in brackets.

Source: BC Environmental Monitoring Data System (EnMoDS) results, Environmental Monitoring and Analysis Branch, Province of BC, records to September 19, 2026 (Open Government Licence – British Columbia); lake outlines and names: Freshwater Atlas lakes, Province of BC (Open Government Licence – British Columbia). Summaries by PlaceDossier.

Where it was sampled

  • E330871 Centre 139 readings

Site names are tidied from the provincial records; the IDs find each site's full record there.

What this record doesn't cover

Algae bloom reports and invasive mussel checks aren't in this record: the province's Algae Watch map and mussel monitoring aren't published as open data. For swimming, check the regional health authority's beach advisories; for blooms and mussels, ask the province's regional environment office or the local lake association.

Readings are from the province's monitoring database: samples taken by provincial staff, volunteer lake monitors, and companies and local governments that sample under their permits. We keep the ice-free season (May to October), and for phosphorus and chlorophyll only samples from the top 5 m. We leave out sites whose names put them at a water intake, a sewage or industrial outfall, a mine or a permit holder's works, or on the shore (a beach, dock or boat launch): water there can differ a lot from the open lake. Each year's figure is the median of that year's readings. We give a lake a summary, a comparison with other lakes and a nutrient level only when it has at least 10 summer readings from open water, spread over at least 3 different years, since 2012; the summary is the median of those readings. With fewer, or only older ones, we show the readings and say there are too few to judge the lake. A reading below the lab's detection limit counts at that limit. One site can be a bay rather than the open lake, so a lake's figures can differ from one end to the other.

Water quality changes with the season, the weather and the part of the lake. These are past readings, not a test of the water today: before you buy, ask the local government and the lake association what's known, and test a drinking-water intake yourself.