PlaceDossier / BC places / Lakes

BC lake · 13 km² · Francois Lake watershed

Burns Lake

Its median summer Secchi depth over 2016–2026 was 1.9 m, from 39 readings. Murkier than 90% of the 62 BC lakes with enough recent readings.

The readings

176 summer readings from open water on record from 1990 to 2026, at 3 sampling sites.

Median since 2012Compared with BC lakes
Secchi depth1.9 m
2016–2026, 39 readings
Murkier than 90% of the 62 BC lakes with enough recent readings.
Total phosphorus23 µg/L
2015–2026, 45 readings
Higher than 77% of the 100 BC lakes with enough recent readings.
Chlorophyll a7.5 µg/L
2015–2026, 44 readings
Higher than 88% of the 83 BC lakes with enough recent readings.
Secchi depth how deep a black-and-white disc stays visible: deeper means clearer water
0246 1990200020102020 2016: median 1.6 m from 4 readings2017: median 1.8 m from 4 readings2018: median 1.9 m from 4 readings2019: median 2.3 m from 4 readings2020: median 3.1 m from 2 readings2021: median 1.5 m from 4 readings2022: median 1.7 m from 4 readings2023: median 1.9 m from 4 readings2024: median 2.8 m from 4 readings2025: median 2.6 m from 4 readings2026: median 1.7 m from 1 readingm
Total phosphorus the nutrient that most often feeds algae in BC lakes
1030 1990200020102020 1990: median 25 µg/L from 19 readings1993: median 21 µg/L from 4 readings2002: median 21 µg/L from 8 readings2003: median 22 µg/L from 5 readings2005: median 27 µg/L from 4 readings2015: median 19 µg/L from 5 readings2016: median 15 µg/L from 4 readings2017: median 20 µg/L from 4 readings2018: median 34 µg/L from 4 readings2019: median 20 µg/L from 4 readings2020: median 21 µg/L from 2 readings2021: median 37 µg/L from 4 readings2022: median 20 µg/L from 4 readings2023: median 29 µg/L from 4 readings2024: median 20 µg/L from 4 readings2025: median 22 µg/L from 4 readings2026: median 32 µg/L from 2 readingsµg/L
Chlorophyll a the green pigment in algae: a direct measure of how much is growing
1310 1990200020102020 2002: median 9.6 µg/L from 8 readings2015: median 6.9 µg/L from 4 readings2016: median 7.4 µg/L from 4 readings2017: median 3.9 µg/L from 4 readings2018: median 6.6 µg/L from 4 readings2019: median 3.9 µg/L from 4 readings2020: median 6.5 µg/L from 2 readings2021: median 19 µg/L from 4 readings2022: median 8.5 µg/L from 4 readings2023: median 16 µg/L from 4 readings2024: median 7.1 µg/L from 4 readings2025: median 7.9 µg/L from 4 readings2026: median 16 µg/L from 2 readingsµg/L

Median each year (bigger dot, more readings)Middle half of BC lakesBC median

Source: BC Environmental Monitoring Data System (EnMoDS) results, Environmental Monitoring and Analysis Branch, Province of BC, records to September 19, 2026 (Open Government Licence – British Columbia); lake outlines and names: Freshwater Atlas lakes, Province of BC (Open Government Licence – British Columbia). Summaries by PlaceDossier.

Nutrient level Inferred

The measures disagree: clarity reads eutrophic, phosphorus reads mesotrophic, algae reads eutrophic. That's common: clarity also depends on silt and colour, not just algae.

IndexClass
From secchi depth (1.9 m, 2016–2026)51eutrophic
From total phosphorus (23 µg/L, 2015–2026)49mesotrophic
From chlorophyll a (7.5 µg/L, 2015–2026)50eutrophic

Inferred by us, not a provincial classification. The index was built for summer readings from the middle of a lake; ours mix sites and months, so treat the class as a rough guide.

How we worked this out

Carlson's trophic state index (Carlson 1977, Limnology and Oceanography 22:361) turns each median into a score: 60 − 14.41 ln(Secchi m), 14.42 ln(phosphorus µg/L) + 4.15, 9.81 ln(chlorophyll µg/L) + 30.6. Classes after Carlson and Simpson (1996): under 40 oligotrophic, 40 to 50 mesotrophic, 50 to 70 eutrophic, 70 and over hypereutrophic.

Year by year

YearSecchi depthTotal phosphorusChlorophyll a
20261.7 m (1)32 µg/L (2)16 µg/L (2)
20252.6 m (4)22 µg/L (4)7.9 µg/L (4)
20242.8 m (4)20 µg/L (4)7.1 µg/L (4)
20231.9 m (4)29 µg/L (4)16 µg/L (4)
20221.7 m (4)20 µg/L (4)8.5 µg/L (4)
20211.5 m (4)37 µg/L (4)19 µg/L (4)
20203.1 m (2)21 µg/L (2)6.5 µg/L (2)
20192.3 m (4)20 µg/L (4)3.9 µg/L (4)
20181.9 m (4)34 µg/L (4)6.6 µg/L (4)
20171.8 m (4)20 µg/L (4)3.9 µg/L (4)
20161.6 m (4)15 µg/L (4)7.4 µg/L (4)
2015–19 µg/L (5)6.9 µg/L (4)
2005–27 µg/L (4)–
2003–22 µg/L (5)–
2002–21 µg/L (8)9.6 µg/L (8)
1993–21 µg/L (4)–
1990–25 µg/L (19)–

Median of each year's May to October readings; the number of readings is in brackets.

Source: BC Environmental Monitoring Data System (EnMoDS) results, Environmental Monitoring and Analysis Branch, Province of BC, records to September 19, 2026 (Open Government Licence – British Columbia); lake outlines and names: Freshwater Atlas lakes, Province of BC (Open Government Licence – British Columbia). Summaries by PlaceDossier.

Where it was sampled

  • 0400379 Near Deadman's Island 87 readings
  • 1130618 Deep station #2 62 readings
  • 0400375 West basin in middle 27 readings

Left out: 5 readings at 2 sites whose names put them away from the open lake

  • 0400376 West of Sewage outfall 3 readings; an outfall or discharge
  • 0400377 Near outfall 2 readings; an outfall or discharge

Site names are tidied from the provincial records; the IDs find each site's full record there.

What this record doesn't cover

Algae bloom reports and invasive mussel checks aren't in this record: the province's Algae Watch map and mussel monitoring aren't published as open data. For swimming, check the regional health authority's beach advisories; for blooms and mussels, ask the province's regional environment office or the local lake association.

Readings are from the province's monitoring database: samples taken by provincial staff, volunteer lake monitors, and companies and local governments that sample under their permits. We keep the ice-free season (May to October), and for phosphorus and chlorophyll only samples from the top 5 m. We leave out sites whose names put them at a water intake, a sewage or industrial outfall, a mine or a permit holder's works, or on the shore (a beach, dock or boat launch): water there can differ a lot from the open lake. Each year's figure is the median of that year's readings. We give a lake a summary, a comparison with other lakes and a nutrient level only when it has at least 10 summer readings from open water, spread over at least 3 different years, since 2012; the summary is the median of those readings. With fewer, or only older ones, we show the readings and say there are too few to judge the lake. A reading below the lab's detection limit counts at that limit. One site can be a bay rather than the open lake, so a lake's figures can differ from one end to the other.

Water quality changes with the season, the weather and the part of the lake. These are past readings, not a test of the water today: before you buy, ask the local government and the lake association what's known, and test a drinking-water intake yourself.